The most professional law firm in Latin America offers a divorce solution for mutual agreement separations that can grant you a legal divorce decree in just a couple of weeks.
Quick Divorce in the Dominican Republic is available to foreigners or Dominican citizens residing abroad, when both spouses agree to file this divorce before Dominican Courts. This legal procedure is very simple and only requires the attendance of one of the spouses during the hearing which takes usually less than half an hour and you can leave Dominican Republic the same day in the afternoon.lt takes ten to fifteen days to obtain your divorce decree, which is to be sent to your home or office by courier (DHL or FedEx).
WDALAW Principal Explains the Quick Divorce Process
- Is the Dominican Divorce Valid in the United States?
- Frequently Asked Questions About the Dominican Divorce
At WDA we are ATTORNEYS AT LAW WITH PRACTICE IN DOMINICAN REPUBLIC. We are specialists in family law and DR divorces. All your documents are drafted by the same ATTORNEYS that will go with you to court. Your divorce case is handled BY ATTORNEYS, not paralegals or secretaries so that we make sure all documents submitted to court contain due process drafting and legal wording as needed both in the courts of Dominican Republic and your country of origin.
* Thanks to you and everyone at you firm. I consider myself lucky to have found you.
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year !
- V. L., New York
My Divorce was fast, I received a great service and the lawyers at the firm handled my case very profesionally.
It trully is a great service that is easy to accomplish and only took 2 weeks for me.
I recommend WDA sincerely if you want to get a fast and quick divorce.
- M.J, Kansas City
Now I would like to say thank you again for a very professional job you and your office did. Every time I had a question you immediately answered. You gave me the correct forms which needed to be complete, you explained what I had to do and where to get the required approvals. You made the process very very easy and very fast, Also you told me to come to Santo Domingo and booked a good reasonable hotel. The next morning I had the divorce hearing in front of a judge. I would recommend your service to anybody, you are very professional, fast and make a painful process painless. www.wdalaw.com
I am absolute sure that in 10 days I will have my legal documents in China. I am also experienced in this process, I have a legal degree from Germany in divorce. At the moment I teach business at a local college in China. You can use my name and Internet ID for anybody who wants/need a divorce. Also your cost was much lower than other attorney's in Santo Domingo.
Muchas gracias, Xie Xie Ni - Danke schoen.
If you ever want to visit China please let me know and I will arrange the trip of your life time.
- Xie Xie ,China
Quick Divorce Process
1. Order
2. Receive drafted papers, have them legalized and return to our office
3. Come to a hearing
4. Receive your divorce decree
WDA LAW has over 10 years of experience in family law, international adoptionas and trademark registration. Our knowledgeable lawyers are prepared to commit to your case and provide an enjoyable experience in your divorce process.
The spouse that is to attend hearing in Santo Domingo will only have to spend 1 night in Dominican Republic. Please be sure to bring with you to Dominican Republic passport and other piece of identification (social security card, identification id, driver s license) to complete the divorce.
free consultation
Please contact your travel agent in order to determine documents needed to enter Dominican Republic. Citizens of U.S., Canada and major European countries do not require of a visa but a valid passport and a tourist card which can be provided either by your travel agent or obtain upon arrival at the Dominican Airport. Our staff could take care of hotel reservations upon request. The day of hearing, formal attire is required (office kind attire).
jueves, 5 de agosto de 2010
miércoles, 26 de marzo de 2008
jamaica trademark
http://trademark-1.com/
Trademark Registrations In Antigua and Barbuda
In The island of Jamaica the Department responsible for maintaining public control ofTrademark Registrations In Antigua and BarbudaOffice (JIPO). The service marks, collective marks and brands are now registrable under the new legislation Jamaican. Jamaica is a member is a signatory country to the Paris Convention, which guarantees protection for well-known marks and gives the right to claim priority rights on the
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Svenska Örtmedicinska Institutet AB, of Västra Frölunda, Sweden, represented by Anna Påhlsson, Esq. and Lars-Erik Ström, Esq. of Advokatfirman Konsultbyrån för Marknadsrätt of Malmö, Sweden.
The Respondent is Swedish Herbal Institute, Ltd of York Habor, Maine, United States of America, represented by James B. Bartlett, Esq. of York Habor, Maine, United States of America.
2. The Domain Names and Registrars
The disputed domain names are
3. Procedural History
The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the "Center") on June 26, 2003. It disclosed the existence of prior court proceedings between the parties and that arbitration is pending. On June 27, 2003, the Center transmitted by email to Intercosmos Media Group and to Network Solutions, Inc. a request for registrar verification in connection with the domain names at issue.
On June 27, 2003, Intercosmos Media Group transmitted by email to the Center its verification response confirming that "Swedish Herbal Institute" is listed as the registrant of the domain names
On July 9, 2003, Network Solutions, Inc. transmitted by email to the Center its verification response confirming that the Respondent "Swedish Herbal Institute, Ltd" is listed as the registrant of the domain names
In response to a notification by the Center that the Complaint was administratively deficient, the Complainant filed an amendment to the Complaint on July 9, 2003. The Center verified that the Complaint, as amended, satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2(a) and 4(a), the Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceeding commenced on July 10, 2003. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5(a), the due date for Response was July 30, 2003. A Response and Motion to Terminate and/or Stay the Proceeding was filed with the Center that day.
The Center appointed Alan L. Limbury as the Sole Panelist in this matter on August 4, 2003. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7.
The language of the proceeding was English, being the language of the registration agreements.
The motion to terminate and/or stay this proceeding
The Respondent asserted that this proceeding circumvents orders of the Maine Federal District Court and the State of Maine, York County Superior Court, under which certain claims by the Complainant arising out of a 1996 Distribution and Licensing Agreement were referred to arbitration and are presently pending before an arbitrator under the auspices of the American Arbitration Association International Center for Dispute Resolution ("ICDR"). A motion in that arbitration was filed simultaneously with the Response in this proceeding, seeking an injunction to restrain the Complainant from continuing this proceeding.
In light of the pending motion and arbitration before the ICDR, the Respondent requested the Panel, pursuant to Rules 10, 17 and 18, to terminate or stay this proceeding pending the decisions of the ICDR arbitrator on the Respondent’s motion for an injunction and on the claims and counterclaims filed in that arbitration.
The Respondent described the Response as "a Preliminary Response as required by Rule 5" and requested permission to supplement it in the event the Panel does not grant the motion to terminate and/or stay.
- Trademark Registrations in Argentina
- Trademarks Registrations In Barbados
- Trademaks registrations in Bolivia
- Trademaks Registrations In Brasil
- Trademarks Registrations In Chile
- Trademarks Registrations In China
- Trademarks Registrations In Colombia
- Trademarks Registrations In Costa Rica
- Trademarks Registrations In Puerto Rico
- Trademarks Registrations In Cuba
- Trademarks Registrations In Dominican Republic
Gmail is officially in beta, and the company certainly has enough cash to make attractive buy-out offers to the other claimants. It's a serious gaffe.
Google must compete equally with the other claimants.
"The application process is first come, first served," said Sharon Marsh, a USPTO administrator. "Applications are processed as they're received, and the person second in line will get a refusal of registration from our examiner."
Google is fourth in line. First is Cencourse, a Miami, Fla., company that provides multimedia services, with an application filed March 31,2004, the same day Google's news broke. Next up is Precision Research, a Santa Barbara, Calif., company that consults on the design of high-tech equipment, with an application dated April 2. Following them is the British firm Independent International Investment Research (IIIR), formerly known as The Market Age, which operates Pronet Analytics, a stock research service; IIIR applied on April 3. Google didn't file its application until April 7, but at least it beat the Gospel Music Association's April 8 paperwork.
"We will continue to develop and build upon our Gmail brand while pursuing registration of the mark, in class 38, with the USPTO," Cencourse CEO Steve Sikes told internetnews.com. But he isn t feeling litigious. "We prefer to refrain from comments concerning 'infringement.'"
Shane Smith, IIIR chairman and CEO, told internetnews.com that his company's attorneys have contacted the acknowledged leader in search.
"All I can tell you at this point is that we are in discussion with Google regarding their proposed Gmail service," he said.
Google spokesperson Steve Langdon admitted the company had been contacted by IIIR, but would not confirm that discussions were taking place.
Trademark Registration in Cuba
Trademark Registration in Ecuador
Gmail Trademark in Dispute
With Google's IPO near, four other companies claim the name of its Web-based e-mail service.
August 12, 2004
By Susan Kuchinskas: 
More stories by this author:
While news of the beta launch of Gmail, Google's free Webmail service, thrilled the public, it sent a few companies running to the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office to stake their claims.
According to USPTO records, Google's March 31 news inspired a bit of a land rush, with four other companies filing applications to set their claims in stone.
The news is the latest in a series of missteps that have come to light as Google's IPO approaches. The Mountain View, Calif. search provider expects to raise as much as $3.3 billion in its initial public offering, with trading expected to start the week of August 16.
Google has made multiple revisions to its prospectus, but still has not disclosed that it may not be able to continue using Gmail. The IPO prospectus clearly states, "Our unregistered trademarks include ... Gmail ...."
Trademark Registration in El Salvador
Trademark Registration in Haiti
Trademark Registration in Honduras
Trademark Registration in Jamaica
"We are confident in our right to use the trademark Gmail," he said.
IIIR's Gmail is a service for subscribing clients, including securities traders, bankers, hedge fund brokers and retail investors.
"My firm has operated a service of similar name since May 2002, which is also a Web-based e-mail service," Smith said.
He confirmed that IIIR sought trademark protection in the United States when it became aware of Google's plans.
"Having invested in making our target market aware of our service, we wish to avoid the confusion that would inevitably arise if a much, much larger firm were to brand its service indistinguishably from our own," he said.
It's likely that the dispute is headed to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. The USPTO's Marsh explained that, although none of the trademark applications had been assigned to an examiner yet, they would not be assigned to one person who could sort out the claims.
"Our attorneys pick up work as they need additional work, and cases are assigned in order received," she said. However, the examiners can search other applications in progress and use the information in making their determinations.
Marsh said that companies can oppose others' applications or petition the USPTO to cancel a trademark registration. At those times, the examiner will consider who used the mark first.
In Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings, Marsh said, "Looking at issues like the dates of use and who used the mark first are usually very important." Generally, she said, the first person to use it will win the trademark, "but there can be some legal twists and turns."
Under that criterion, Precision Research would win the trademark, claiming it s used Gmail since January 1998. The Gospel Music Association would be next in line, thanks to its having sent members its Gmail e-mail newsletter since 1999. Neither organization returned calls.
This isn't the first time Google has fallen afoul of prior trademark claims. Its very name is in dispute: Stelor Productions filed two briefs opposing Google's trademark registration with the USPTO. Stelor has held a trademark on the term "Googles" for children's books since 1994 and applied to extend that to computer services, including e-mail, online bulletin boards and general kid-friendly information.
Richard Wolfe of Holtsville, N.Y., operator of Froogles.com, an online bargain shopping site, filed an opposition to Google's March 2004 application for a trademark on Froogle, the name of its own product search service.
Maybe next time, Google should google before it chooses a name.
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)